Rethinking
his ira
Eric
Haglund:
“I don't know if you’ve had a chance to read the recent New Yorker
piece on Paul Krugman (it’s a
great read, as you’d expect from the New
Yorker), but I was rather startled to find out that Krugman and his
wife ‘pulled out of the stock market ten years ago and never went
back.’ I know it’s not his particular area of expertise and
that you shouldn’t allow yourself to get spooked by one guy’s
opinion, but Krugman is a pretty damn smart guy and tends to be right a lot of
the time. And there’s something to be said for the fact that somebody
like me, whose knowledge of the stock market comes from books like yours
and whose participation in the market is almost entirely limited to index
funds, still really doesn’t know what the heck he’s doing with this
stuff. Are P/E ratios way out of line with what they’ve historically
been, as Krugman says? Search me! It occurs to me that if somebody
challenged me on why my Roth IRA is entirely invested in index funds, all
I’d be able to say in response is, ‘because guys like Andrew Tobias
say that’s what you should do.’ Suddenly the ground beneath my feet
doesn’t feel all that sturdy.”
☞ I don’t know how close you are to retirement, or any of the
other factors that could affect your asset allocation; but with the Dow back at
11,000, I don’t think you’d be crazy to reassess a bit.
For
example, you might diversify with a little gold – GLD, which trades like
a stock, is the simplest way – despite the fact that, for the long term,
gold will surely not be as productive an investment as . . . well, actual
productive investments.
But
the more intriguing shift might be into a Roth IRA under the management of my
friend Joel Greenblatt’s Formula
Investing. It’s sort of like index investing, but with a significant
twist (namely, picking a basket of just the best businesses selling at the
lowest valuations); with still-modest costs and, because this is a Roth IRA, no
tax drag.
There’s
no guarantee, his method will beat the index funds. But Joel is a pretty smart
guy. For example, if you read Michael Lewis’s The
Big Short (do! do!), you’ll notice that Joel spotted Dr. Mike
Burry (the one-eyed medical student whose phenomenal investing success, as
written up by Lewis, was excerpted
in Vanity Fair) and gave him $1 million for 25% of his aborning hedge fund
before anyone else did.
Clearly,
rare people like Dr. Burry can beat the indexes by spotting value. And rare
people like Joel have done very well spotting value themselves. His Formula
Investing won’t make you rich; but I’d be surprised if, over time,
it didn’t outpace the index funds, especially when sheltered from tax
consequences inside a retirement account.
Then again, how big is your IRA? If it’s large enough,
me-mail me about a couple of small private managers who may be able to do even
better still. (Or may not.)
INCREASED
CORPORATE POWER
Corporations
tend to back Republican Presidents, and Republican Presidents from Reagan on have
been nominating justices like Scalia and Thomas – who gave us George W.
Bush, who in turn gave us Roberts and Alito, who in turn decided recently in
Citizens United to give corporations still more power to influence elections.
As
reported by ProPublica
– here
– that added influence can be easily hidden. And it extends far beyond
national elections.
.
. . Businesses must reveal their identities on public [2] reports [3] to the Federal Election Commission if they buy
advertising on their own. But one popular and perfectly legal conduit for
companies wanting to influence politics under the radar is to give money to
nonprofit trade groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
The Chamber and its national affiliates spent
$144.5 million [4] last year on advertising,
lobbying and grass-roots activism -- more than either the Republican or
Democratic party spent, according to a Center for Responsive Politics analysis
of public records -- while legally concealing [5] the names of its funders. The Los Angeles Times
reported
this week [6] that the Chamber is building a
grass-roots political operation that has signed up about 6 million non-Chamber
members.
Some of the positions the Chamber has successfully
advanced on behalf of its donors include a nationwide campaign to unseat state judges [7] who were considered tough on corporate defendants
and opposition to a federal bill that would
have criminalized defective auto manufacturing [8].
.
. .
CHOCOLATE
Bob
Diem: “Regarding
your recent chocolate [reduces the risk of stroke and heart attack] post, your
readers might be interested in cocoa
nibs. I mix them with raisins and nuts to make a delicious and healthy
trail mix. Keeps me away from the unhealthy snacks.”