Minority
Leader John Boehner talks of “Armageddon” if health care reform is
signed into law. Even though the legislation is scored not just as
“revenue neutral” but as actually reducing the deficit.
(Contrast that with the trillions in war spending and tax-cuts-for-the-rich that
Republicans enacted without any effort to pay for either one, and the gigantic
deficits that resulted.)
Will
it be Armageddon if the 45,000 people now estimated to die each year for lack
of coverage don’t die?
Armageddon
because we’ll be inching toward the kinds of coverage they have in all
the other wealthy nations of the world?
Armageddon
because we’ll be stressing preventive care?
Or
because we’ll be launching a slew of pilot programs – including
pilot programs for tort reform – that start the process of building a
more efficient health care system?
Armageddon
because illness-caused bankruptcies will plummet?
Armageddon
that insurers will have to pay out 80% to 85% of their premiums (depending on
the number of insureds covered) in health care reimbursements?
Armageddon
because people will no longer have to worry about losing coverage if they
switch jobs?
Armageddon
that, as Republicans suggested we should, we’ll now be sending
investigators posing as patients to help root out fraud?
Armageddon
that consumers will have more carriers competing for their business?
I
can totally see how thoughtful people would have written this legislation
differently. There is endless legitimate discussion to be had over the best
approaches, constrained though those approaches must be by political reality.
But
Armageddon?
To
my mind (let alone truly world-class minds like Bill Clinton’s and Barack
Obama’s), the bill that passed last night is a vast improvement over the
status quo.
A
government take-over? (As in, Keep the government’s hands off
Medicare!) Death panels? Armageddon?
It
is really scary to see the
crowd incited this way.*
It
does not lead to good policy, good health, or good will.
The
truth is, yesterday was a wonderful day for America. This enormous freight
train, frozen in its tracks for so long, has begun to roll. Now, with
enlightened regulation and further legislation to spur competition and
innovation, we may actually get somewhere.
*When
I see angry demonstrators (or even just angry Republican Congresspersons)
desperate to “stop the bill,” I remember their equal urgency to
“stop the count” of Florida ballots. Yet, would it really have
been so terrible for America if we had had Gore instead of Bush? Really?