|
|
SIMPLY PUT: “There
are times where you can afford to redecorate your house, and there are times
when you need to focus on rebuilding its foundation. Today, we have to
focus on foundations.” – Barack Obama, Thursday, February 26, 2009. That’s really it.
And why tax cuts to help people redecorate their houses cannot be our top
priority right now. (“No tax cut built a road, no tax cut puts a
cop on the street, no tax cut educates a child.” – House Finance
Committee Chair Barney Frank) This was the line of argument
I tried to pursue yesterday in response to Governor Jindal’s call for
more tax cuts. Here,
now, the 12 measures Newt Gingrich is putting forth to solve our problems (look
for a full page Wall Street Journal ad coming soon to tout them):
☞ Yes?
So? This would require tremendous borrowing from our children, and to
what end? See yesterday’s
five questions. How would Newt answer them? And if cutting the payroll
tax in half is good, why not eliminate it altogether? And eliminate the
income tax, too? Oh wait . . .
☞ So not
eliminate it, but slash it. But again, why just down to 15%? Why
not to 5%? True, this is the kind of peculiarly Republican patriotic sacrifice
it’s easy to ask people to make – “please, take these tax
cuts: we need you to do it so we can create jobs” – but how would
it create jobs? How would Newt answer yesterday’s five
questions?
☞ Somehow,
American innovation and job creation did just fine for decades when the
corporate rates were higher than they are today. And, of course,
the effective rate most companies pay is much lower – many corporations
pay zero federal tax even in years when they actually have profits to pay them
on. Is this really the way to rebuild America’s
infrastructure? Would American companies really not want to bid on the
work that needs doing because profits are taxed? I know a dredging
company just itching for a chance to unclog our nations waterways that
would be eager to hire new people to take on the added work and make
more profits, even though the profit is subject to tax. Rebuilding
America’s infrastructure is not, by the way, something that can easily be
outsourced to Ireland.
☞ Outstanding
– you’ve heard much the same thing from President Obama. A
point of potential common ground.
☞ Outstanding
– you’ve heard much the same thing from President Obama. A
point of potential common ground. It was shameful how earmarks exploded
when the Republicans controlled Congress; shameful how they got rid of “pay-as-you-go”
budgeting. Terrific to have Newt’s considerable influence on the
right side of this issue.
☞ If Newt
knows effective ways to deter theft and fraud that the states don’t
– or that they do know but for some reason don’t care to implement
– my only quibble is that he waited until now to sound the alarm.
(If his method is simply to eliminate programs that experience any
fraud, cutting off the 95% or 99% of honest, deserving recipients, then you can
see how reasonable people would disagree about where to draw the line.)
☞ Another
point of exciting common ground . . . if not necessarily on all the
specifics. (See for example, COAL, below).
☞ Somehow,
there were huge pools of venture capital available when the capital gains rate
was higher than it is today. Google, Apple, IBM, Cisco, Intel,
FedEx, Starbucks, Amazon – all these and thousands more were started when
the rate was higher. Is there even one lone entrepreneur anywhere
in America burning to start a great new business – or one potential
investor looking to score big – who fails to move forward because, if he
succeeded, he’d have to pay 15% or 20% in taxes on his eventual $10
million or $100 million or $1 billion bonanza? Name one such
person, Newt. Seriously! Name one!
☞ Agreed (at
least by me). But for this not to be disingenuous, Newt needs to go along
with provisions that would truly allow UNforced unionism. There is a
compromise to be made here, and the status quo is not it.
☞ No question:
unnecessary regulation should be dropped. Just what fits that definition
is a little harder to agree on. But I’ll bet there will be a lot of
receptivity to reexamining this.
☞ Newt is just
so way too smart for this pap. (Americans should work for their families,
not for Washington? So who should pay, say, for our military – Peruvians?
Who should pay for our National Institutes of Health – Austrians? Who
should pay for our disaster relief or the interest on our National Debt – Egyptians?) First off, something like 98%
or 99% of Americans already are effectively exempt from any estate
tax. And way back in the last century, President Clinton let it be known
he’d happily adjust the tax – going immediately to a $3.5 million
exemption (which is effectively $7 million with a by-past trust) and then
indexing it to inflation. Those may not be the exact numbers, but it was
that general range (which, with inflation, by now would have been more like $5
million and $10 million). So fewer than one in 100 estates would be
affected. But what Newt is saying is
that if you work hard and leave a $5 billion estate – or even just a $40
million estate – you shouldn’t have to throw any of your chips back
into the game, we should raise the needed revenue some other way, from people
less fortunate than you. And maybe he’s right, though a lot of smart
wealthy people (Warren Buffett, among them) argue strenuously that he’s
not. But job creation? A short-term stimulus to solve today’s
crisis? How does he figure? The two things are completely
unrelated. The only certain long-term effects would be, first, a terrible
blow to charities (as it would become much less advantageous for rich people to
give); second, even more concentration of wealth (someday, we could be one of
those countries with just six really wealthy, powerful families, owning and
controlling everything; oh, boy, I can’t wait); and, third, the
aforementioned need to replace this tax revenue by taxing less wealthy, living
people.
☞
Outstanding! We’re with you all the way. SIGNS OF
PROGRESS Thorsten
Kril: “The stimulus projects are already starting here in Santa
Clara county, to which $25 million has been allocated. (The first
project: metering lights for highway on-ramps. It will be a big help for traffic
around here.) We will have a lot of construction to make our
infrastructure more efficient. And then there is $8 billion for the new
high-speed rail system from LA to SFO. Some good news for a change! It’s
lifting morale around here before the projects even begin. Our
President’s plan makes sense, so does his vision for our country, and
equally important is the rapid and relentless execution of this vision,
including the new budget. You can see it all coming together.” COAL I have never been given even
a lump, so I claim no expertise; but this 30-second
spot – directed by the Coen Brothers, who gave us everything from Fargo
(Best Pic ’96) to No Country for Old Men (Best Pic ’07) – will
make you think twice about “clean coal.” SOLAR “I’d
put my money on the sun and solar energy. What a source of power! I hope that we
don’t have to wait 'til oil and coal run out before we tackle
that.” – Thomas A. Edison (1847-1931) “Florida Power &
Light broke ground today on a 25-megawatt solar power plant, the Sunshine
State's first commerical-scale photovoltaic array.” – Environment and Energy Daily,
February 26, 2009 All part of The Great
Transition. HONG KONG
LIGHTS UP Stephen Willey: “You might like this picture
of downtown Hong Kong. If you place your cursor at the top of the photo, you'll
notice it shows 6:10 a.m. As you bring it down slowly over the photo, the
pictures slowly darkens and the city lights come on. At 7:40 p.m. it’s
dark. Photo technology at its best!” Have a great weekend.
|
Webdesign by Marc Fest
© Copyright Andrew Tobias