|
|
ONE WAY TO OWE NO TAXES: HAVE NO INCOME So today is the deadline for your fourth quarterly 2008 estimated income tax.
But of course you have probably none due because all those taxable gains from
early 2008 were wiped out by losses you took last month to lower your tax
bill. Poor Uncle Sam is going to see his receipts fall off a cliff. TAX CUTS I just have to keep saying it. This is really dumb. I guess we have
to do some of it, for political reasons, but that famous line – who
can spend your money better, you or the government? – is not nearly
as wise as it sounds. You will spend your money to pay down credit card
balances (as you should, but that hardly creates jobs) or to shore up
retirement savings (as you should, but that hardly creates jobs) or to
buy clothes (that creates jobs in Shanghai) or to buy a flat screen TV (that
creates jobs in Seoul), or to take the kids skiing or to take your honey to dinner
twice a month instead of once a month – which is good for the chef,
waiters, and busboys, but here is the thing we have to ask ourselves: Is now really the time to keep borrowing (for this tax cut will be
financed entirely with borrowed money) to keep more busboys and waiters
employed? Or is now the time to be borrowing to become energy independent,
build a smart energy grid, digitize our medical records, dredge our waterways,
repair our bridges, and educate our children? Is now the time to be borrowing to give people with jobs a
break (much as we’d like to), or is it the time to be borrowing to extend
unemployment benefits – and, by spending on infrastructure, create new
jobs? Should we borrow to give people the money to go out to dinner and
keep restaurants open? Or should we borrow to funnel money to the states to keep them from having to lay off
teachers and cops and shut down after-school programs? Which would be worse? Becoming a nation with fewer auto
dealerships and fewer retail stores – perhaps even fewer real
estate agents and fewer restaurants – or remaining a nation whose
infrastructure continues to deteriorate and whose kids fall further and
further behind the global competition? And (while we’re at it) why do we have nice, bright people
– who could be teaching math – selling something, automobile
insurance, everyone is required by law to have in the first place? We
don’t sell Social Security one policy at a time, why auto insurance? Why
not just build the price of insurance into the cost of fuel and the cost of
driver’s licenses (if we want an efficient way to charge young people
extra), the cost of registrations (if we want an efficient way to charge more
for muscle cars), and the cost of moving violations (because we want to charge
bad drivers more than good drivers)? A fella could write a book! As will become increasingly clear, we are not in a steep
recession out from which we will emerge more or less as we entered it.
We’re at the beginning of a process of reinventing ourselves as a more
efficient, greener nation. This is ultimately a good thing, even though
there will be widespread pain along the way. In any event, it is a necessary thing. MEDICAL EFFICIENCY And some of it doesn’t even have to be painful. Mark: “I found another good article
on check lists in medicine saving lives and money. F Well, and incoming HHS Secretary Tom Daschle for sure. That
article screams out to be forwarded to your doctor and any hospital
administrator – or elected official – you know.
Some of us still use Managing Your Money for DOS, first released
in 1984, before PC’s had hard drives, and last updated in 1993. Hey, if
it works, don’t fix it. (Though don’t buy it, either.) And when it doesn’t work, Mike
Starkey – who is like the one guy left at NASA from 1969 who actually
knows how to put a man on the moon – may just be able to fix it. Click here for
his just-created MYM FAQ.
|
Webdesign by Marc Fest
© Copyright Andrew Tobias