|
|
WHO GOT THE WEALTH WE SPREAD
AROUND This
pie chart shows how the $863 billion of household income growth from 2002 to 2006
was spread around. Three-quarters of it went to the top 1%. And Bush/McCain/Palin
think that wasn’t enough – that those good folks needed tax cuts on their additional income, even if it
meant going further into National Debt to provide them. It’s just loony tunes to hear McCain/Palin
trying to frighten small business owners.
For the approximately 98% who net less than $250,000 a year, taxes would
go down or stay the same. And for the top 2% (a
group very much NOT including Joe the Plumber or the owner of the business Joe
hopes to buy), it’s not as though taxes would be confiscatory. They would simply be much as they were under
Clinton/Gore, a time when almost everyone
– very much including the rich – was doing well. The real spread-the-wealth-income-redistribution-welfare
state is On top of that, unlike Ohio, say, which gets back less than half a
buck in federal assistance for every dollar paid in federal taxes, Alaska gets
back more like five times what it
pays. I VOTED YESTERDAY Go ye, if your state has early voting, and do likewise. Larry from F Yay! (Larry acknowledges it was Senator McCain’s
choice of Governor Palin that finally pushed him over
the edge. Here
is Monty Python’s John Cleese on this choice.) I BOUGHT STUFF YESTERDAY Not huge amounts – I’d be surprised if we’ve seen the bottom. But I do think most people are now relatively
confident that the world’s central bankers simply will not allow a general collapse
of the financial system, no matter what it takes to prevent it. Good news.
And because so many investors expect a tough, perhaps prolonged
recession, that expectation may be largely built into stock prices. (Then again, it’s been so long since we had a
prolonged, tough recession, investors may have forgotten, or never been alive
to know, just how discouraged markets can get.
Or how many stocks really can go to zero, as their underlying company
gets reorganized through bankruptcy.) Tax-selling drives battered shares even lower as people sell to realize
losses they can use to offset gains they may have taken earlier in the year and
up to $3,000 in ordinary income. So 10,000 Boise Paper warrants could be had
for $200 yesterday morning (and $350 yesterday afternoon), down 99% from their
high less than a year or so ago. I bought a zillion of them
not because I expect the underlying
company, Boise Paper, to
thrive. But what if it did muddle
through? Its stock is down from $10 to
53 cents. What if by June 18, 2011, when
those warrants expire, the stock had returned to $10? Highly unlikely, to be sure, but not
impossible – and, exercisable at $7.50, each one would be worth about $2.50. So the 10,000 you bought for $200 – plus a
deep discount broker’s $8 commission – would have become a $25,000 long-term
capital gain. A less reckless speculation, though still very much a speculation,
would be to buy BZ stock itself. The
leverage is not as great – and the possibility of total loss certainly still
there – but with the stock, there is no deadline by which better times must return. If the stock hit $5 five years from now, you’d
have made nearly 10 times the yesterday’s 53-cent closing price
. . . whereas the warrants would long since have expired
worthless. Speculations like this abound (and my track record at picking them
is, as many of you have learned from sorry experience, mixed). But I bought some Altus
Pharmaceuticals yesterday at 50 cents, down from its $14 high a year
ago. It has no debt to speak of and
plenty of cash, at least for now. It’s a
bet that the FDA will approve a drug someone smarter than me thinks it will approve.
|
Webdesign by Marc Fest
© Copyright Andrew Tobias