BIGGER THAN AN iPHONE
BUT WITH FEWER CAPABILITIES
John Grund: “This video
fits your theme of how we all live like
princes today. It’s a commercial
from the 1970s promoting the ‘world's
smallest electronic calculator.’ Watch
through till the end – you’ll be shocked by the price.”
F Yes, I remember not being able to afford one
my second year of business school. (Back
then, a year’s tuition was only about $2,500, if memory serves. In that context, “the world’s smallest electronic
calculator” was no trivial expenditure.)
THE SOLUTION TO ALL OUR PROBLEMS
Solar
power your home and your car, even on
cloudy days and at night. Fuel cost:
zero. Carbon footprint: zero. Click here and then on News
Coverage – the ABC News clip will give you the idea, and the New York Times report will flesh it
out.
Basically,
rooftop solar panels make electricity – but
also hydrogen that gets stored in tanks, to be (a) converted back to
electricity when the sun isn’t shining and (b) used as fuel your car.
Free
heat! Free electric! Free “gasoline” (because these cars wouldn’t need
gasoline).
“But
who has room for all those enormous hydrogen tanks?” I asked one of the people
involved. “They take up the entire back
yard!”
“We
put them above ground for the demonstration, but they’d be buried below ground.”
“But
they’re so big! Even if they were
underground, they must cost a fortune to buy and bury. Can this really be economical?”
“For
the demonstration, and to get approval from the authorities in New Jersey, the hydrogen
is packed at 200 pounds per square inch (like propane). But if you up that pressure to 5600 psi, which is easy to do, you shrink the required size 28-fold
to just one small-ish tank.”
“Yeah. And then: kaboom!”
“No, actually. It
can be made safe. The tanks envisioned for
hydrogen cars would have us safely careening along the
highways with tanks at even higher pressure.”
F Whether or not this little start-up leads
the way, my point is that 20 years from now, we could look back on “the energy
crisis” as something humanity largely invented its way out of.
Of course, 20
years is a long time to hold your breath, so it may be perfectly appropriate to
dress your daughter up as Cassandra this Halloween, even as you dress up her
twin as Pollyanna. It’s all a matter of
your time horizon.
But I keep
thinking about Ray Kurzweil’s formulation, summarized
here in
December, that the next 50 years of technological progress will be 32 times as
astounding as the progress of the past 50 years. So when you consider that “the world’s
smallest electronic calculator” came to market just 36 years ago, let alone, 50, and
compare it with an iPhone (which, adjusted for
inflation, costs just a small fraction as much), there may be hope yet.
Later This Week: The McCains Have a
Vast Fortune (But He’s Right: The Economy Is Really Not His Strong Suit). Also: SPACS.