And a Safe-ish Way to Short the Market
|
EQUALITY Here’s
a summary by state. (For race,
religion, and ethnicity, every state has a perfect score, so those are not
shown here.) How does your
state rank? REGULATION I am one of the
fortunate frequent fliers unaffected by American Airlines’ thousands of cancellations
last week. Yet I’m still angry. Here was the FAA that,
like other federal agencies (e.g., the Justice Department, FEMA), had been
turned to the service of the Republican Party or cronyism or the industry it
was meant to regulate. And here it was now
determined to fix its dereliction – as it surely should – yet “fixing” it in an
almost intentionally dumb way. (The term
“malicious obedience” may apply: obediently doing what one is “supposed” to in
a way designed to make people sorry they ever criticized you in the first
place.) No? The issue behind all those cancellations was
not metal fatigue that could suddenly have affected a plane, but a quarter-inch
difference in the spacing of fasteners that could surely have been corrected
over 90 days, not “instantly.” The FAA
endangered our safety by firing inspectors who wanted the airlines to follow
the rules. And now is goes overboard in
the other direction. (“You want
regulation? I’ll give you regulation!”) A SAFE-ISH WAY TO SHORT THE MARKET Joe: “If you’d like to
short the market (which you’d have to be insane not to do), there is an exchange-traded fund, RSW, which
moves 2 times inversely to the S&P 500.
I have a working order to buy RSW at 83 in my IRA accounts. It got close before the market went down
again. I would buy more if the market
continued to rise.” F Normally, shorting the market is
dumb. First, who the heck knows which
way it will go? Timing the market is all but impossible. Second, profits from short sales, when you do
make them, are always taxed as short-term gains, even if you’ve held the short position
for years. Third, you have to pay dividends on your short position
(and only big players get their brokers to share the interest on the cash
received from their short sales).
Fourth, your losses are, at least in theory, unlimited. There is a psychological cost to assuming
that risk that can be hard to handle. Fifth,
and most importantly, the market’s long-term trend is up. Between inflation and
real growth, how could it not be?
Productivity marches along with technology; population grows; and profits,
when not paid out in dividends, enhance share value. (Even a savings
account will hit new highs each year,
so how bright do the CEOs of an S&P 500 company need to be to grow the
value of his or her enterprise at least a little
in most years?) That said, there are certainly times the market drops sharply. If it were to drop 20% from here (say), RSW
would rise 40%. And if you held this ETF (exchange-traded fund)
for more than a year, your realized gain would
be lightly taxed. And, where shorting is
never legal within a retirement account, going long RSW is – not least because your loss is not unlimited. (You can lose
all you invest, but no more.) So, many
of the disadvantages of shorting are avoided. That still
doesn’t make it easy to time the market.
I admit I would be surprised if we have seen the bottom – so owning some
RSW could be a prudent hedge. But who knows? I would be surprised by a dot.com-style
crash, a la the year 2000, or a Nikkei Dow style
crash (down to 13,000 today, 18 years after its 1990 high of 40,000) – or a
Depression. Among the
reasons: Still, Joe has
obviously got me thinking. RSW could be
a good hedge. LIVING LIGHT ON THE PLANET Remember: Human
Footprint on the National Geographic Channel, tonight at 9pm and midnight,
and again next Sunday afternoon at 4pm.
© 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 Andrew Tobias